Comparison of clinical treatment effect between dental implant repair and conventional repair in patientswith dentition loss
口腔种植修复与常规修复术对牙列缺失患者的临床治疗效果对比

摘要

目的 研究口腔种植修复与常规修复术对牙列缺失患者的临床治疗效果。方法 选择2021年1月到2022年6月到本院治疗牙列缺失患者共40例作为观察对象，依照治疗方式的不同，分作实验组和对照组，分析两组治疗效果。结果 治疗后，实验组固位力评分、舒适度评分、语言功能评分明显高于对照组，P＜0.05；治疗前，两组患齿健康指数（SBI、GI）对比，P＞0.05，治疗后，两组患齿健康指数（SBI、GI）对比，P＜0.05；治疗后，牙龈状况、种植体色泽、软组织色泽、牙槽骨状况对比，P＜0.05；实验组不良反应发生率1（5.00%）低于对照组6（30.00%）。结论 运用口腔种植修复技术对牙列缺失患者治疗，效果显著，安全性高，可运用。

Abstract

Objective To study the clinical effect of dental implant repair and conventional repair on patients with dentition loss.
Methods A total of 40 patients with missing dentition, from January 2021 to June 2022, were selected as the observation subjects. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into experimental groups and control groups, and the treatment effects of the two groups were analyzed.
Results after treatment, the retention score, comfort score and language function score of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05); Before treatment, the health index (SBI, GI) of teeth in the two groups was compared, P > 0.05. After treatment, the health index (SBI, GI) of teeth in the two groups was compared, P < 0.05; After treatment, gingival condition, implant color, soft tissue color and alveolar bone condition were compared, P < 0.05; The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group 1 (2.00%) was lower than that in the control group 7 (14.00%), P < 0.05.
Conclusion   dental implant repair technology is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with dentition loss.