期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Oral Science Research. 2022; 1: (3) ; 18-20 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.iosr.20220027.

Comparison of the effectiveness of one-off root canal and multiple root canal in the treatmentof dental pulp diseases
牙体牙髓病治疗中一次性根管和多次法根管的应用有效性比较

作者: 陈娟 *

仪陇县人民医院 四川南充

*通讯作者: 陈娟,单位:仪陇县人民医院 四川南充;

发布时间: 2022-10-09 总浏览量: 355

摘要

目的 研究牙体牙髓病治疗中一次性根管和多次法根管的应用有效性。方法 选择2022年9月-2022年10月到本院治疗牙体牙髓病的患者共52例作为观察对象,随机分为实验和对照两组,分析疗效。结果 实验组的治疗有效率为96.15%(25/26),明显优于对照组76.92%(20/26),P<0.05;治疗前,两组VAS评分无差异,P>0.05;治疗5d、10d后实验组VAS评分低于对照组,P<0.05;实验组各项指标均优于对照组,P<0.05;实验组并发症发生率3.85%(1/26),要低于对照组23.08%(6/26),P<0.05。结论 运用一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病疗效与安全性均可得到保障,值得推广。

关键词: 牙体牙髓病;一次性根管;多次法根管;疗效;并发症

Abstract

Objective To study the effectiveness of single root canal and multiple root canal in the treatment of dental pulp diseases.
Methods A total of 52 patients with dental pulp disease who were treated in our hospital from September 2022 to October 2022 were selected as the observation objects. They were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group, and the efficacy was analyzed.
Results The effective rate of the experimental group was 96.15% (25/26), which was significantly better than that of the control group (76.92% (20/26), P<0.05; Before treatment, there was no difference in VAS scores between the two groups (P>0.05); The VAS score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group after 5 and 10 days of treatment (P<0.05); All indexes in the experimental group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05); The incidence of complications in the experimental group was 3.85% (1/26), which was lower than that in the control group (23.08% (6/26), P<0.05).
Conclusion   The efficacy and safety of disposable root canal therapy for endodontic diseases can be guaranteed, and it is worth popularizing.

Key words: dental pulp disease; Disposable root canal; Multiple root canal; Efficacy; complication

参考文献 References

[1] 马天骄.多次法根管和一次性根管治疗法对牙体牙髓病的临床治疗有效性探讨[J]. 医药前沿,2021,11(1):74-75,78.

[2] 朱莹,孙卫国,高洁. 一次性根管治疗对改善牙体牙髓病患者咀嚼功能的效果研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志,2022,38(3):164-167. 

[3] 李作东. 多次法根管和一次性根管治疗法治疗牙体牙髓病的临床疗效分析[J]. 黑龙江医学,2020,44(7):907-909.

[4] 赵姝. 多次法根管和一次性根管在牙体牙髓病中的应用价值探讨[J]. 中国医疗器械信息,2019,25(3):153-154. 

[5] 覃雪. 多次法根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病疗效及并发症探析[J]. 全科口腔医学杂志(电子版),2019,6(24):76,86.

[6] 孙诗雨.一次性根管和多次根管对牙体牙髓病的疗效及VAS评分的影响对比[J].中国实用医药,2022,17(16):91-93. 

[7] 孙娜,刘思强. 多次法与一次性根管对牙体牙髓疾病的治疗效果及对并发症的影响[J]. 中国医药指南,2019,17(14):187-188.

[8] 陈志宇. 隐裂牙体牙髓病冠修复与根管同步治疗效果[J]. 黑龙江医药,2022,35(2):444-446.

[9] 郝俊祥,王金莹,高志强. iRoot SP冷侧法在C型根管填充治疗牙体牙髓病中的咀嚼功能及对疼痛程度的影响[J]. 中国美容医学,2022,31(7):150-152.

[10] 李雅静. 半导体激光联合Vitapex糊剂及牙胶尖根管充填对牙周牙髓联合病变患者牙周指数的影响[J]. 黑龙江医学,2022,46(11):1334-1336.

引用本文

陈娟, 牙体牙髓病治疗中一次性根管和多次法根管的应用有效性比较[J]. 国际口腔科学研究, 2022; 1: (3) : 18-20.