期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Oral Science Research. 2022; 1: (4) ; 18-22 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.iosr.20220034.

Lower anterior alveolar bone morphology and orthodontic risks in adults skeletal class III malocclusion
成人骨性III类错𬌗的下前牙牙槽骨形态与正畸风险

作者: 褚丹阳, 武小峰, 谢丽丽 *

河北省人民医院 河北石家庄

*通讯作者: 谢丽丽,单位:河北省人民医院 河北石家庄;

发布时间: 2022-12-29 总浏览量: 519

摘要

成人骨性III类错合畸形正畸治疗方法有掩饰性治疗和正畸正颌联合治疗,下切牙的移动方式和可允许的范围是设计矫治路线和矫治成功的关键。了解下切牙区牙槽骨的形态特征,与矢状和垂直骨型的关系,牙根在牙槽骨中的位置关系,可以避免在牙齿移动过程中,牙槽骨骨量不足带来的牙周破坏和牙根吸收等风险[1]。因此本文就成人骨性III类错合下前牙区牙槽骨形态研究现状,及对正畸风险的影响做一综述。

关键词: 骨性III类错合;下前牙;牙槽骨;正畸风险

Abstract

The orthodontic treatment methods for skeletal class III malocclusion in adults include camouflage treatment and combined orthodontic and or thognathic treatment. The movement mode and allowable range of the lower incisors are the key to the design of the orthodontic route and the success of the orthodontic treatment. Understanding the morphological characteristics of the alveolar bone in the lower incisor area,its relationship with the sagittal and vertical bone types, and the position of the root in the alveolar bone can avoid the risk of periodontal damage and root absorption caused by insufficient alveolar bone during tooth movement[1] .Therefore, this article reviews the research status of alveolar bone morphology in anterior teeth under skeletal class III malocclusion in adults and its impact on orthodontic risk.

Key words: Skeletal class III malocclusion; Lower anterior teeth Alveolar bone; Orthodontic risks

参考文献 References

[1] Horiuchi A, Hotokezaka H, Kobayashi K. Correlation between cortical plate proximity and apical root resorption[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,114(3):311-318.

[2] Alhammadi M S, Halboub E, Fayed M S, et al. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2018,23(6):40-41.

[3] 陈昊. 术前正畸去代偿对骨性Ⅲ类患者前牙区牙槽骨的影响[D].中国医科大学,2021.

[4] Al-Masri M M, Ajaj M A, Hajeer M Y, et al. Evaluation of Bone Thickness and Density in the Lower Incisors' Region in Adults  with Different Types of Skeletal Malocclusion using Cone-beam Computed Tomography[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2015,16(8):630-637.

[5] Lee S, Hwang S, Jang W, et al. Assessment of lower incisor alveolar bone width using cone-beam computed tomography images in skeletal Class III adults of different vertical patterns[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2018,48(6):349-356.

[6] 王博, 房兵, 樊林峰, 等. 成人骨性Ⅲ类错下前牙区牙槽骨厚度的测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012,21(04):422-426.

[7] 傅民魁. 口腔正畸专科教程[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2007.

[8] Kubota M, Nakano H, Sanjo I, et al. Maxillofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1998,20(5):535-542.

[9] 陆兴龙. 整体远移下颌牙列治疗轻中度骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)的临床研究[D].郑州大学,2018.

[10] 许净雯. 骨性Ⅲ类错合畸形下中切牙区牙槽骨形态与垂直骨面型相关性研究[D].重庆医科大学,2014.

[11] Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciger S, et al. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002,122(1):15-26.

[12]  Beckmann S H, Segner D. Changes in alveolar morphology during open bite treatment and prediction of treatment result[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2002,24(4):391-406.

[13] Zhang F, Lee S C, Lee J B, et al. Geometric analysis of alveolar bone around the incisors after anterior retraction following premolar extraction[J]. Angle Orthod, 2020,90(2):173-180.

[14] 毛铭馨, 徐莉, 靖无迪, 等. 骨性安氏Ⅲ类错(牙合)畸形患者前牙唇侧牙槽嵴顶位置及相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020,52(01):77-82.

[15] Casanova-Sarmiento J A, Arriola-Guillen L E, Ruiz-Mora G A, et al. Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: A CBCT Study[J]. Int Orthod, 2020,18(1):79-88.

[16] Oh S H, Nahm K Y, Kim S H, et al. Alveolar bone thickness and fenestration of incisors in untreated Korean patients with skeletal class III malocclusion: A retrospective 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study[J]. Imaging Sci Dent, 2020,50(1):9-14.

[17] Sun B, Tang J, Xiao P, et al. Presurgical orthodontic decompensation alters alveolar bone condition around mandibular incisors in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015,8(8):12866-12873.

[18] Yao C J, Chang Z C, Lai H H, et al. Architectural changes in alveolar bone for dental decompensation before surgery in Class III patients with differing facial divergence: a CBCT study[J]. Sci Rep, 2020,10(1):14379.

[19] 朱伟豪, 娄姝, 潘永初. 不同垂直面型骨性Ⅲ类患者切牙牙槽骨骨量的研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2021,41(05):424-429.

[20] Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciger S, et al. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002,122(1):15-26.

[21] 周向向. 成人骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)前牙区去代偿前后牙槽骨形态的CBCT研究[D].郑州大学,2021.

[22] Beckmann S H, Kuitert R B, Prahl-Andersen B, et al. Alveolar and skeletal dimensions associated with overbite[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,113(4):443-452.

[23] Jain S, Puniyani P, Saifee A. Mandibular symphysis morphology and lower incisor angulation in different anteroposterior jaw relationships and skeletal growth patterns - a cephalometric  study[J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2020,93(1):97-104.

[24] Wang X M, Ma L Z, Wang J, et al. The crown-root morphology of central incisors in different skeletal malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Prog Orthod, 2019,20(1):20.

[25] Nimigean V R, Nimigean V, Bencze M A, et al. Alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations: an anatomical study and review[J]. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 2009,50(3):391-397.

[26] 张丽琪. 上下颌切牙区牙槽嵴矢状面形态分析[D].北京大学医学部,2021.

[27] Ghassemian M, Lajolo C, Semeraro V, et al. Relationship Between Biotype and Bone Morphology in the Lower Anterior Mandible:  An Observational Study[J]. J Periodontol, 2016,87(6):680-689.

[28] Jain S, Puniyani P, Saifee A. Mandibular symphysis morphology and lower incisor angulation in different anteroposterior jaw relationships and skeletal growth patterns - a cephalometric  study[J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2020,93(1):97-104.

[29] Srebrzynska-Witek A, Koszowski R, Rozylo-Kalinowska I. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018,22(3):1567-1578

[30] 杨偲, 全淑琪, 邢珂, 等. 成年高角女性下前牙区牙槽骨形态分析[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2022,30(01):33-38.

[31] Lu C L, Li B W, Yang M, et al. Relationship between alveolar-bone morphology at the mandibular incisors and their inclination in adults with low-angle, skeletal class III malocclusion-A retrospective CBCT study[J]. PLoS One, 2022,17(3):e264788.

[32] 吴国涛, 侯永福, 刘新强. 骨性Ⅲ类患者舌姿势位与下颌切牙牙槽骨厚度相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2014,34(S1):26-29.

[33] 马志贵. 牙槽骨开裂/骨开窗及其修复的临床和实验研究[D].上海交通大学,2016.

[34] Yagci A, Veli I, Uysal T, et al. Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012,82(1):67-74.

[35] Evangelista K, Vasconcelos K F, Bumann A, et al. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010,138(2):131-133, 133-135.

[36] 洪建梅. 正畸治疗中不同牙周生物型牙槽骨厚度变化的临床研究[D].昆明医科大学,2017.

[37] 杨桦, 贾莹, 王永. 骨性Ⅲ类错下颌前部牙槽骨形态的CT分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2015,31(09):1478-1481

[38] 刘娟, 贾莹, 杨桦, 等. 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合体分段长轴倾斜方向的一致性评价[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016,34(02):165-170.

[39] 张莉, 王博, 房兵. 骨性Ⅲ类错下前牙区牙槽骨形态的锥形束CT分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2012,10(01):38-41.

[40] Handelman C S. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae[J]. Angle Orthod, 1996,66(2):95-109, 109-110.

[41] Horiuchi A, Hotokezaka H, Kobayashi K. Correlation between cortical plate proximity and apical root resorption[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,114(3):311-318

[42] 王晨星, 高振杰, 陈刚. 骨性Angle′s Ⅲ类错患者正畸手术前后下颌角矢量点位置的变化及意义[J]. 山东医药, 2011,51(22):98-99.

[43] 张婕,李小彤.骨性安氏Ⅲ类手术患者前牙区的牙槽骨厚度[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2016,48(01):111-115.

[44] Kim Y, Park J U, Kook Y A. Alveolar bone loss around incisors in surgical skeletal Class III patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009,79(4):676-682.

[45] 周琳, 李巍然. 锥形束CT牙槽骨测量的准确性与可靠性的系统评价[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2014,21(01):7-13.

[46] 黄芸. 不同骨面型青少年错(牙合)畸形患者尖牙区硬组织CBCT研究[D].遵义医科大学,2021.D

引用本文

褚丹阳, 武小峰, 谢丽丽, 成人骨性III类错𬌗的下前牙牙槽骨形态与正畸风险[J]. 国际口腔科学研究, 2022; 1: (4) : 18-22.