Open Access Article
International Oral Science Research. 2023; 2: (1) ; 8-12 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.iosr.20230003.
Study on the difference of curative effect between orthodontic priority mode and surgical priority modeon skeletal class Ⅲ patients
正畸优先模式与手术优先模式对骨性Ⅲ类患者疗效的差异性研究
作者:
李永婷 *,
马江敏
联勤保障部队第九八八医院 河南郑州
*通讯作者:
李永婷,单位:联勤保障部队第九八八医院 河南郑州;
发布时间: 2023-03-21 总浏览量: 340
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
摘要
安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的患病率有较明显的种族差异。欧美国家患病率为0.8%~2.0%,亚洲国家为4%~20%。我国安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的总患病率为4.76%(95%CI:3.85%~6.54%)。安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形常表现为单纯上颌后缩、单纯下颌前突,或两者兼有。安氏Ⅲ类错牙合的病例多伴有骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形,部分病例可以通过单纯正畸的方式进行掩饰性治疗。而对于严重的骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的成年患者,通常采用正畸-正颌联合治疗,此类患者常已出现较明显的牙齿代偿现象。有学者认为如果Ⅲ类患者具备以下6种情况中的4种(覆盖≤-4.73 mm; Wits≤-11.18 mm; IMPA≤80.8°;Mx/Mn≤65.9%;覆牙合≤-0.18 mm;下颌角≥120.8°),那么患者将被建议手术治疗。传统的正颌手术时机取决于9~18个月术前正畸排齐整平、去代偿的程度,这个过程有助于产生一个可预测的精确结果。
关键词: 正畸优先模式;骨性Ⅲ类患者;差异性
Abstract
There are obvious racial differences in the prevalence of Angle Class Ⅲ malocclusion. The prevalence rate is 0.8% ~ 2.0% in Europe and America, and 4% ~ 20% in Asian countries. The total prevalence of Class Ⅲ malocclusion in China is 4.76% (95% CI: 3.85% ~ 6.54%). Angle class Ⅲ malocclusion often manifests as simple maxillary retraction, simple mandibular protrusion, or both. Most cases of Angle's Class Ⅲ malocclusion are accompanied by skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion, and some cases can be treated by simple orthodontics. For adult patients with severe skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion, orthodontics-orthognathic treatment is usually used, and such patients often have obvious tooth compensation. Some scholars believe that if class Ⅲ patients have four of the following six conditions (coverage ≤-4.73 mm; Wits≤-11.18 mm; IMPA≤80.8°; Mx/Mn≤65.9%; Overbite ≤-0.18 mm; Mandibular angle ≥ 120.8), then the patient will be recommended for surgical treatment. The timing of traditional orthognathic surgery depends on the degree of orthodontic alignment and decompensation 9 ~ 18 months before operation, which is helpful to produce a predictable and accurate result.
Key words: Orthodontic priority mode; Patients with skeletal class Ⅲ; Otherness
参考文献 References
[1] Hardy DK, Cubas YP, Orellana MF.Prevalence of angle Class Ⅲ malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. O J Epi, 2012, 2(4):75-82.
[2] Lin M, Xie CM, Yang HM, et al.Prevalence of malocclusion in Chinese school children from 1991 to 2018:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2020, 30(2): 144-155.
[3] Johnston C, Burden D, Kennedy D, et al. Class Ⅲ surgical-orthodontic treatment: A cephalometric study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2006, 130(3): 300-309.
[4] 成人安氏Ⅱ~1类与Ⅱ~2类错牙合软组织侧貌对比研究[J]. 李晓光;赵玥;王瑾曈;赵刚;刘继光.黑龙江医药科学,2014(06).
[5] 恒牙初期安氏Ⅱ类错软组织侧貌特征的X线头影测量及软硬组织相关性分析[J]. 袁东辉;左艳萍;董福生.临床口腔医学杂志,2006(10)
[6] 微种植体支抗矫治骨性Ⅱ类错牙合的临床应用8例[J]. 朱晓华.口腔医学,2013(03).
引用本文
李永婷, 马江敏, 正畸优先模式与手术优先模式对骨性Ⅲ类患者疗效的差异性研究[J]. 国际口腔科学研究, 2023; 2: (1) : 8-12.