Effect of prefibrillated post on periodontal indexes of patients undergoing dental prosthesis
预成纤维桩对口腔修复治疗患者牙周指标的影响

摘要

目的 浅析预成纤维桩对口腔修复治疗患者牙周指标的影响。方法 筛选2021年2月-2023年12月期间在某卫生服务中心行口腔修复治疗100例患者实施分组研究，分组方式为电脑随机抽签法，组别设置为对照组与研究组，每组各纳入50例。对照组采用可塑纤维桩进行修复治疗，研究组则使用预成纤维桩进行修复治疗，从治疗前后牙周指标改善情况、龈沟液细胞因子水平变化以及不良反应发生率三个方面综合评价预成纤维桩修复治疗效果。结果 治疗前，对比两组患者各指标并显著性差异（P＞0.05）；治疗后，两组患者BI、PD、PLI指标以及IL-6、PGE2水平对比，经 t 检验，组间差异显著（P＜0.05），研究组低于对照组；两组患者不良反应发生率对比，经χ2检验，组间差异显著（P＜0.05），研究组低于对照组。结论 不管采用可塑纤维桩还是预成纤维桩进行口腔修复治疗均可有效改善患者牙周指标，但预成纤维桩效果更理想，且更加安全、可靠。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effect of prefibrillated post on periodontal indexes of patients undergoing dental prosthesis.
Methods From February 2021 to December 2023, 100 patients who received oral prosthesis treatment in a health service center were selected for a group study. The group was divided into control group and study group with 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with plastic fiber post, while the study group was treated with prefibroblast post. The effect of prefibroblast post was comprehensively evaluated from three aspects: improvement of periodontal indexes before and after treatment, changes of cytokine levels in gingival creval fluid and incidence of adverse reactions.
Results Before treatment, there were significant differences in all indexes between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, BI, PD, PLI indexes, IL-6 and PGE2 levels were compared between the two groups. T-test showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05), and the study group was lower than the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was significantly different (P < 0.05) by χ2 test, and the study group was lower than the control group.
Conclusion   Both plastic fiber post and pre-fiber post can effectively improve the periodontal indexes of patients, but the effect of pre-fiber post is more ideal, safer and more reliable.