期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Oral Science Research. 2024; 3: (2) ; 12-15 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.iosr.20240013.

Comparison and sampling point detection of the total number of bacterial colonies in waterway of oral comprehensive treatment table
口腔综合治疗台水路菌落总数不同培养基的比较与采样点检测

作者: 陈永刚 *

北京市中关村医院 北京

*通讯作者: 陈永刚,单位:北京市中关村医院 北京;

发布时间: 2024-06-28 总浏览量: 107

摘要

目的 比较4种不同培养基在检测口腔综合治疗台菌落总数结果的不同,以及口腔综合治疗台不同采样点菌落总数的区别。方法 5台A-dec口腔综合治疗台分别于消毒前在漱口水、三用喷枪、高速手机、洁牙机4个采样点进行采样,用4种不同的培养基进行细菌培养,重复3次,比较细菌菌落计数。结果 生活饮用水标准检验方法推荐培养基、医疗机构消毒技术规范推荐培养基、改良胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂培养基细菌培养结果无统计学差异,与R2A培养基培养结果有统计学差异;三用喷枪、高速手机、洁牙机采样点细菌培养计数无统计学差异,与漱口水采样点细菌培养计数结果有统计学差异。

关键词: 口培养基;口腔综合治疗台水路;细菌感染;感染控制

Abstract

Objective To compare the results of four different media in detecting the total number of bacterial colonies on oral comprehensive treatment table, and the difference of the total number of bacterial colonies at different sampling points on oral comprehensive treatment table.
Methods Before disinfection, 5 A-dec oral comprehensive treatment tables were sampled at 4 sampling points, including mouthwash, spray gun, high-speed mobile phone and dental cleaning machine, respectively. 4 different media were used for bacterial culture, repeated 3 times, and the bacterial colony count was compared.
Results There was no statistical difference in the results of bacteria culture in the medium recommended by the standard test method of drinking water, the medium recommended by the technical specification of disinfection in medical institutions, and the improved peptone soybean AGAR medium, but there was statistical difference between the results and R2A medium. There was no statistical difference in the bacterial culture count of the sampling points of the spray gun, high-speed mobile phone and dental cleaning machine, but there was statistical difference in the bacterial culture count results of the sampling points of mouthwash.

Key words: Oral medium; Oral comprehensive treatment table waterway; Bacterial infection; Infection control

参考文献 References

[1] 江宁,徐春华,田靓,等. 上海市医疗机构口腔综合治疗台水污染情况调查[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2014,31(07):729-731.

[2] 沈瑾,苏静,孙惠惠,等. 口腔综合治疗台水路污染状况调查[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2014,5(08):53-55.

[3] Porteous N, Sun Y, Dang S, et al. A comparison of 2 laboratory methods to test dental unit waterline water quality[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2013,77(3):206-208.

[4] 天津市市场和质量监督管理委员会. 口腔综合治疗台用水微生物标准[S].:天津市卫生和计划生育委员会, 2018.

[5] 北京市市场监督管理局. 口腔综合治疗台水路消毒技术规范[S].:北京市卫生健康委员会, 2019.

[6] Smith R S, Pineiro S A, Singh R, et al. Discrepancies in Bacterial Recovery from Dental Unit Water Samples on R2A Medium and a Commercial Sampling Device[J]. Current Microbiology, 2004,48(4):243-246.

[7] 邓伟江,石凤群,林德健,等. 口腔科牙椅储水瓶消毒效果监测[J]. 中国校医, 2009,23(05):517-518.

[8] 赵红,苏静,梁炜,等. 纸片培养法与平板培养法监测口腔水路细菌污染的比较研究[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2015, 32(5):489-490.

[9] Inc A-Dec. 牙椅水路推荐维护保养说明[Z].

[10] Putnins E E, Di Giovanni D, Bhullar A S. Dental unit waterline contamination and its possible implications during periodontal surgery[J]. J Periodontol, 2001,72(3):393-400.

[11] Arvand M, Hack A. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines in dental practices in Hesse, Germany: A cross-sectional study[J]. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp), 2013,3(1):49-52.

引用本文

陈永刚, 口腔综合治疗台水路菌落总数不同培养基的比较与采样点检测[J]. 国际口腔科学研究, 2024; 3: (2) : 12-15.